The Premier League statement explained the reasons behind VAR's decision to support the referee's call not to send off Brighton's Joao Pedro for his actions towards Brentford's Yehor Yarmolyuk, but what are your thoughts on the matter?
Pedro avoided any punishment after he and Yarmolyuk became embroiled in a scuffle during the Seagulls' goalless draw with the Bees.
Yarmolyuk, who had just come on as a substitute, prevented a Brighton breakaway by pulling Pedro's shirt. The Brighton forward responded by throwing his right elbow in the direction of the defender's face but missed.
Monterosa
This content is provided byMonterosa
, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enableMonterosa
cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options. Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented toMonterosa
cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allowMonterosa
cookies for this session only. Enable CookiesAllow Cookies OnceReferee Andy Madley stopped play to give Yarmolyuk a yellow card but was instructed by VAR Chris Kavanagh to delay play while the incident was checked. Despite replays confirming Pedro had thrown his elbow in Yarmolyuk's direction, it was not deemed a red card offence.
The Premier League Match Centre on X released an explanation as to why Pedro avoided a caution: "The referee's call of no red card to Joao Pedro for violent conduct was checked and confirmed by VAR, who deemed the referee's call was not clear and obviously wrong."
TrendingEx-Premier League referee Mark Clattenburg told Amazon Prime that Pedro rightly avoided a red card as he had not made contact with Yarmolyuk.
"If we look at the laws of the game as it's written, it has to be to strike an opponent or attempt to strike an opponent," said Clattenburg.
"Because there was no contact he can't be sent off the field of play for the contact. Therefore, it's whether he attempted to strike the opponent. The more I look at it, because it's an unusual action, especially from behind he is looking towards Andy Madley when he swings his arm. He keeps his arm quite close to his body and I think it's more of a gesture to the referee.
"Andy Madley is in a very good position. He couldn't have been sent off for the contact but he could have been sent off for the attempted contact. I believe it's a gesture more than an attempted strike.
"I think Joao Pedro makes a gesture to the referee but if he wanted to swing and use brutality he would have swung his arm out and created contact."
After the game, Brentford boss Thomas Frank expressed his confusion at the decision suggesting Pedro should have been sent off for the attempt.
"As I understand the rules, you can't swing your arm to try and hit someone," Frank said.
"Whether you hit them or not, it's a red, that's how we understand the rules."
Brighton boss Fabian Hurzeler took a different view, rejecting the notion the incident warranted a sending off.
"For me, it's not a red card," Hurzeler said after the game.
"He tried to get free from a personal duel."